Ayaaub Khan Noor Khan Pathan Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.,(2013) 4 SCC 465 (Affidavit is not an evidence)

Hanumant Govind Nargundkar Vs, State of M.P., AIR 1952 SC 343 (Panchasheel Rule)

Kalyan Kumar Gogoi Vs. Ashutosh Agnihotri and Ors., AIR 2011 SC 760 (Meaning of

Ram Bihari Yadav vs. State of Bihar, AIR 1998 SC 1850 (Relevancy

R.M.Malkani Vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1973 SC 157 (Res Gestae and Hearsay Evidence)

R. Vs. Foster, 1834 (6) C & P 325 (Res Gestae an exception to Hearsay)

Umesh Chandra Vs. State of Uttarakhand, Criminal (2021) 17 SCC 616 (Prosecution to prove the process of TIP)

Mirza Akbar vs. King Emperor, AIR 1940 PC 176 (Statement after conspiracy - not relevant)

Badri Rai Vs. State of Bihar, AIR 1958 SC 953 (Statement during conspiracy -Relevant)

Queen-Empress Vs. Abdullah, (1885) ILR 7 All 385 (Sign as conduct)

Bhuboni Sahu Vs. King Emperor, AIR 1949 PC 257 (Proof of impartial witness)

Dudh Nath Pandey Vs. State of UP, (1981) 2 SCC 166 (Strict & cogent proof of Alibi)

Sahadevan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, AIR 2012 SC 2435 (Extra judicial Confession can be relied upon)

Sanjay Dutt Vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2013 SC 2687 (Retracted Confession)

Pyare Lal Bhargava Vs. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1963 SC 1094 (Unsafe to rely on retracted confession)

Pulukuri Kottaya Vs. Emperor AIR 1947 PC 67 (How much of information to be proved)

Palvinder Kaur Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1952 SC 354 (Confession as a whole)

State of U.P. Vs. Deoman Upadhyaya, AIR 1960 SC 1125 (Constitutional Validity of Section 27 of IEA/Section 23 of BSA)

Bhuboni Sahu Vs. The King, AIR 1949 PC 257 (Evidentiary Value of Confession of Co-accused)

Kashmira Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1952 SC 159 (Reliance on confession of co-accused)

Sahoo Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1966 SC 40(Self-talk confession)

Kushal Rao Vs. State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 22 (Uncorroborated dying declaration can be sole basis of conviction)

Laxmi Vs Om Prakash and Ors., AIR 2001 SC 2383 (Dying-declaration made to a police officer is admissible in evidence)

Ram Narain Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1973 SC 2200 (Court can compare handwriting)

Murarilal Vs. State of M.P., AIR 1981 SC 363 (Uncorroborated testimony of an handwriting expert may be accepted)

Rattan Singh and Ors. Vs. Nirmal Gill and Ors., AIR 2021 SC 899 (Expert opinions are not a binding piece of evidence)

Rahim Khan Vs. Khurshid Ahmed & Ors, AIR 1975 SC 290 (Opinion evidence is hearsay)

Dhanpat Vs. Sheo Ram through L.R.s., AIR 2020 SC 2666 (No need of application to produce secondary evidence)

Roop Kumar Vs. Mohan Thedani, AIR 2003 SC 2418 (Difference between Sections 91 & 92 of the IEA (Sections 94 & 95 of the Adhiniyam)

K.M. Nanavati vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1962 SC 605 (Presumption may be rebutted by admissions)

Nandlal Wasudeo Badwaik Vs. Lata Nandlal Badwaik& Anr, AIR 2014 SC 932 (DNA test result prevails over section 112 of IEA/section 116 of BSA)

Rameshwar S/o Kalyan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan, 1952 SC 54(Child  is competent witness & corroboration is question of fact)

Rahim Khan vs. Khurshid Ahmed & Ors, AIR 1975 SC 290 (Opinion evidence is hearsay)

Dhanpat vs. Sheo Ram through L.R.s., AIR 2020 SC 2666 (No need of application to produce secondary evidence)

Roop Kumar Vs. Mohan Thedani, AIR 2003 SC 2418 (Difference between Sections 91 & 92 of the IEA (Sections 94 & 95 of the Adhiniyam)

Nandlal Wasudeo Badwaik Vs. Lata Nandlal Badwaik& Anr, AIR 2014 SC 932 (DNA test result prevails over section 112 of IEA/section 116 of BSA)

Rameshwar S/o Kalyan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan, 1952 SC 54(Child  is competent witness & corroboration is question of fact)